Greetings from London, and firstly
My heart goes out to each and every one of you
It DOES really vacuum when some nice shiny piece of technology turns out to be totally unfit-for-purpose, due to some easily fixable design issues, and a procedural Corporate arrogance, that stops real problems from ever being acknowledged
A bit of background might be in order, of how we got here
“Back in the day” HP grew to become the makers of the finest electronic test & measurement gear money could buy you might want to see some of the writings of the original founders (read them and weep: -
http://www.smecc.org/the_human_side_of_management_-_bill_hewlett.htm
http://www.hpalumni.org/images/Packard_11_Simple_Rules.jpg )
From a really small operation that genuinely engaged with its people to .. Well, partly due to the 21st Century’s way of doing business, employing MBA’s for the top spots of a Company who have no feel or knowledge of the technology or end product – and lousy communication skills (Sorry is my bitterness from working at an early DotCom showing here ?)
Through the 80′s and 90′s HP still made some very advanced, competent stuff – but the turn of the century’s appointment of CEO Carly Fiorina (http://www.cnbc.com/id/30502091?slide=3) and the disastrous acquisition of Compaq http://www.icmrindia.org/casestudies/catalogue/Business%20Strategy1/The%20HP-Compaq%20Merger%20Story.htm , the stock price in the toilet, and the layoff of 18,000 technical staff, well…
Maybe I’m being myopic, but the ONE thing I fail to understand, is her decision to divest the HP name from all the serious T&M gear (becoming ‘Agilent’, a separate company) If ANYTHING gave you a bit of confidence in a gray insubstantial looking computer or peripheral, it would be that it shares some parentage with the finest electronic gear on the planet – (WHAT do they TEACH these alleged ‘managers’, about ‘branding’ ?)
This sure was the end of the ‘HP Way’, of Bill & Dave’s simple people-centric, tech savvy style of management – Oh Fiorina did a FEW things right – the early pavilion PC’s had the names of the techs who designed it stamped on the box, to encourage ‘pride’ – sadly she’d sourced some of the cr*ppiest cheap motherboards for most of the line (causing one of my customers a whole WORLD of trouble) and really WASN’T something a self-respecting hardware geek would like to be associated with
I had a neighbor worked for HP around this time, and there was some SERIOUS partying in 2005 when she got forcibly ejected from the Board (entered politics now, I believe)
OK I’m currently struggling with a friends ZD8000 with a melted charger (is it REALLY worth sourcing another one, with this machines rep, and The ZD7000 having its very own Class Action ? http://www.classcounsel.com/news/hpzd.html
sadly ANY tech buy is a bit of a crapshoot these days – IBM’s used to be really well made, but the Chinese Lenovo’s can be a bit .. variable in quality, so its hard to recommend ANYBODY that heartily – (Samsungs build quality has gotten a lot better these days, mind)
All I can advise is try and be TOO early-adopter with tech purchases, hold back a few months, read plenty reviews, and if you have issues after buying, take notes, record conversations if you can, and remain clam, try every inane thing the ‘support’ suggests, whilst politely rebutting any insane claims such as ‘playing games overclocks your computer’
(Oh and if anyone DOES have the wreckage of their 8000, maybe a charger or something for yours truly..?)
Finally – Bill Hewlett’s ideas on management still live on – Only not at HP !
“a core ideology … which includes a deep respect for the individual, a dedication to affordable quality and reliability, a commitment to community responsibility, and a view that the company exists to make technical contributions for the advancement and welfare of humanity.”[49] The following are the tenets of The HP Way:[50]
1. We have trust and respect for individuals.
2. We focus on a high level of achievement and contribution.
3. We conduct our business with uncompromising integrity.
4. We achieve our common objectives through teamwork.
5. We encourage flexibility and innovation….”
RB
Submitted by Roger B.